Please explain for me. If all the reasons to remove the fencing are valid, why did it get erected the first time? It must cost a lot. on
**********************
The first year the Jazz Festival was held, the St Kitts woman pretty well had the keys of the kingdom and ownership of the park.
Staff under her direction were ordered to rent port-a-potties for the children in the water park.While she had ownership of the public washrooms in the park.
Delegation to Council noted photos of a market vendor with a vehicle in the park, contrary to the Market Bylaw. The vendor was invading space claimed by the Festival organizer. The vendor was ordered out.
Market clients, enjoying a breakfast sandwich, in a space set aside for them on the ball diamond, were ordered out by the Festival organizer.
The fence eventually prohibited access to the washrooms ,despite advice from the town's legal department beforehand, washrooms had to remain accessible.
Standby staff had to be called out to move the fence to provide access to the washrooms.
Not only were user fees of $975. for the band shell waived., a sponsorship of $2,500 provided by the town's manager of economic development, in support of economic development.
I know of no permit granted for erection of a fence or to permit vendors inside the fence to the financial benefit of the festival organizers. I queried and obtained no answers.
They were different times.
No reasons needed to be given for decisions made.
No comments:
Post a Comment