Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Rules Is Rules":
ENOUGH!
This should not be discussed up here. We could do damage while trying to help.
*********
I agree.
We can't have a conversation if only a few people know what it's about. I am not one of the few.
I started it in response to a question about a ruling I made on Tuesday.
David clearly indicated he was going to talk about someone and try to be diplomatic.
It didn't matter who or what he planned to talk about. It was not stated,as required,in his formal request for delegation status.
Had it been, it would have been explained to him by staff, it could not be allowed.
A meeting held for the purpose of conducting town business cannot be used for another personal purpose.
I have better reason than most to know it's a flagrant misuse of the authority of the chair to encourage and permit such abuse.
Ongoing ramifications can be severe. We all have good reason to understand what they are.
So this conversation is over.
No comments:
Post a Comment