Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Not In Any Circumstance":
I think you were just MEAN.
**********
Perhaps you would like to be specific. In what respect do you think I was mean.
Do you know what David planned to talk about.
Did he intend to complain about a Councillor's conduct.
If that was his intent, would he have any reason to believe the Councillor would not respond.
If the complaint was about bullying , was the response likely to be belligerent? I think it might.
What rule would protect David from being humiliated ?
How could it be cited if David was allowed to take the first shot?
Where would it end?
Rules of Order have a purpose. The first principle is to maintain civil discourse.
Councillors must be free to express whatever views are relevant to a question. The requirement is it be done civilly without criticism and without impugning another's motive.
There are a few other governing principles but these are by far the most important.
Procedure also allows a chair's ruling to be challenged.
My ruling was not challenged.
No comments:
Post a Comment